Court Case!! by Alberto Tinoco

First 5 Q's!
1-explain why vince did'nt call the ambulance??
2-Did the sargent analyse the bood found in the stone??
3-why vince did'nt dim his lights?
4-what happened after the accident?
Did the sentence was fair enough?

*Vince deny killing...john?
*Vince insisted that he did'nt dim his lights because john never did it.
*Vince admitted grabing the stone and put it away.
*The judge accused vince for murdering of john.
*Vince pointed out that he did'nt kill john
*the court mention that the sentence is to do social work for 350hrs
*The lawers recommended to increase the licence suspention for at least one year or more.
*Vince promise that he es going to pay the 10.000$ to john's family.
*Vince agree that he is going to pay his sentence.
*Vince apologise for not diming his lights.
*Vince blame john for not diming his lights too.
*John refuse to call the ambulance because he said he did'nt need one
*The court explain that the sentence is given to vince for his acts.

Jury's Veredict!

I think that the veredict is not fair enough because it was an irresponsable act from vince not diming his light as the law says. But in the other hand it is fair the suspention of his licence for a while and the 10.000$ fine that he have to pay and the social work, but i would change somethings like the time period of the licence suspention for at least a year and a half.